Chips Off the Old Block?
|
Type of Entry:
Lesson/Class Activity
|
Type of Activity:
Hands on
Inquiry lab
Group/Cooperative Learning
|
Target Audience:
Life Science
Biology
Integrated Science
|
Notes to the Teacher:
Don Herbert (Mr. Wizard) has stated that he was successful at
helping young people understand science concepts because he used
the familiar (common household items) to explain the unfamiliar.
By using analogies between common items or occurrences and science
concepts we can be more successful at helping our students understand
"the unfamiliar." Genetics is often described as a
subject area in which many concepts are problematic for students.
In order to "use the familiar to explain the unfamiliar"
I decided to use cookies and their recipes as an analogy to organisms
and their DNA "recipes." The first cookie lab I wrote
using that analogy was entitled "Food for Thought: The Cookie
Analogy." It allows classroom discussion of concepts such
as genotype, phenotype, heredity, environment and natural selection.
(It can be found in a publication of the National Association
of Biology Teachers entitled "Favorite Labs From Outstanding
Teachers; Volume II."1993) Another concept that causes difficulties
for students is that of mutation. Many students assume that all
mutations are harmful and can be easily detected on a phenotypic
level. I designed this activity to exemplify the range of effects
that mutations can have including the possibility that they might
easily go undetected.
In the particular course in which I use this activity we begin
with several introductory activities that raise issues that we
attempt to resolve as the course proceeds. Later in the course
we talk about DNA (transcription and translation) and the structure
and function of proteins. At that point we revisit the activity
to see how students might answer the some of the questions raised
in that activity based on their new knowledge.
I hand out the recipes to the students several days before the
activity so that they have adequate time to bake their cookies.
They are all baking chocolate chip cookies, most will be using
the traditional toll house recipe, but about one third of the
students are given a recipe that contains a mutation. For example,
their recipe might call for one egg instead of two, two teaspoons
of vanilla instead of one, or no salt. They are to bring one
dozen of their cookies to class on the day of the activity. I
usually provide plates, napkins, cups and, of course, some milk!
Activity:
"Chips" off the old block?
In this activity we are going to use the analogy of cookie recipes
to that of the DNA "recipes" for living things to help
us understand more about mutations. We are all going to bake
the same type of cookie, the perennially favorite chocolate chip.
Most of you will use the original recipe but a few will be given
recipes in which an alternation (mutation) has occurred. The
day of the activity of you will work in groups to make observations,
including an "in depth enzymatic analysis," to determine
whether a particular cookie was produced from a recipe that contained
a mutation, and, if so, what might that mutation be.
Procedure:
Each class member will bake chocolate chip cookies using the recipe
provided. Most of you will receive the copies of the traditional
recipe seen below but some will be given copies of recipes in
which a "mutation" has occurred.
2 1/4 cups all purpose flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon salt
1 cup butter or margarine
3/4 cup sugar
3/4 cup firmly packed brown sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
2 eggs
1 package (12 oz.) chocolate chips
Preheat oven to 375°F. Beat together margarine, sugar, and
brown sugar until creamy. Beat in eggs. Add vanilla. Combine flour, baking
soda and salt. Gradually add to margarine mixture. Stir in chocolate
chips. Drop by rounded teaspoonfuls onto ungreased cookie sheets.
Bake for 8-11 minutes, until golden brown.
On the day of the activity bring one dozen of the cookies you
baked and put them on a plate provided by the teacher (put your
name on the underside of the plate). We will number the plates
so that they can be identified for the class discussion. After
your cookies are arranged on the plate get together with the members
of your group and move from one plate to the next sampling pieces
of the cookies on each plate. (If you try to eat a whole cookie
from each plate your "in depth enzymatic analysis" could
prove to be too "filling.")
Although you are analyzing the cookies as a group make sure you
each keep a record as to whether or not you believe a particular
cookie was produced from a recipe that contained a mutation.
If you judge a particular cookie to be the result of a recipe
that contained a mutation also include your tentative ideas as
to what that particular mutation might be.
When all the class has had an opportunity to test each plate of
cookies, we will take a vote as to the number of students who
believe each to be the result of a recipe that contained a mutation.
Students will also need to share their ideas as to what the mutation
might have been. After we have taken each vote and shared ideas
the student who baked that cookie will let us know whether or
not it was produced from a recipe that contained a mutation.
If yes, the baker of that cookie will also describe the particular
mutation.
Questions for discussion:
1a. Was there always class consensus as to whether a particular
cookie was produced from a recipe with a mutation?
b. If your answer to part a was "no", give
an example and an idea as to why lack of consensus might have
occurred.
2a. Were any cookies incorrectly labeled as being produced from
a recipe with a mutation?
b. If your answer to part a was "yes" give
an example and an idea as to why that particular cookie might
have been mislabeled.
3a. Propose at least one tentative idea as to why some cookie
mutations are more easily detected than others.
b. Since we are using cookies and their recipes as analogies
for living organisms and their DNA "recipes", extend
or modify the idea you proposed for 3a to explain why some mutations
in humans are more easily detected than others.
Assessment/Evaluation
In the course for which this activity was written the students
keep research notebooks as would practicing scientists. For this
activity their notebook entry should include the number of each
recipe, whether they thought each particular cookie was baked
from a recipe in which there was a mutation, and, if so, what
they think the particular mutation might be. They are also to
record their answers to the questions that are included in the
lab and a summary of our class discussion. That discussion of
each cookie includes a vote on whether or not it was baked from
a recipe that contained a mutation, what some class ideas were
as to what the mutation might be and then the information from
the student who used that recipe. The knowledge they gain from
the activity is also assessed from the class discussion and notebook
entries that follow the later portion of the course in which DNA
and proteins are studied.
Extension/Reinforcement/Additional Ideas
Cookies, which I have even given their own species name "Crustula
suavia" (Latin for "cookie sweet"), and their recipes
are a great analogy that can be useful to teach many topics in
biology, especially those in the subject areas of genetics and
evolution. For example, discussion of why certain cookie recipes
survive and why some are changed or become "extinct"
is a good analogy for change over time. Why certain type of cookies
are common to certain ethnic groups or geographic locations has
proven helpful in discussing diversity. Questions used in the
activity can easily be modified to promote discussion of a particular
topic or topics and the students are quite involved in the activity
because they make the cookies. For some students it is their
first experience with baking, so I tell them that all cookies
get an A.
Cookies can also be tied in nicely with a discussion of proteins
and how some alterations in the DNA sequence may have no effect
on the amino acid sequence or how some changes in the amino acids
sequence may not affect the activity of that protein and thus
not affect the resulting phenotype. Other mutations might affect
the level of expression of a gene which may or may not have an
effect on the phenotype. Each of these ideas can be reinforced
with the cookie analogy as some changes in the recipe can result
in changes in the type of ingredient or the amount of that ingredient
and in either case might still go undetected.
Another variation to the activity can be used to discuss genetic
engineering. In that case I let several students make changes
in the recipe that they believe will improve the cookies and use
that to discuss the genetic engineering of organisms.
Below are examples of the"mutated" recipes that I pass
out to the students. You can use these or come up with some mutations
of your own! If you have an suggestions for changes in either
the orginal cookie lab in the NABT publication or in this activity,
I would appreciate hearing about them.
Recipe A:
2 1/4 cups all purpose flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 cup butter or margarine
3/4 cup sugar
3/4 cup firmly packed brown sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
2 eggs
1 package (12 oz.) chocolate chips
Preheat oven to 375 degrees. Beat together margarine,
sugar, and brown sugar until creamy. Beat in eggs.
Add vanilla.
Combine flour, baking soda and salt. Gradually add
to margarine mixture. Stir in chocolate chips. Drop
by rounded teaspoonfuls onto ungreased cookie sheets.
Bake for 8-11 minutes, until golden brown.
Recipe B:
2 1/4 cups all purpose flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon salt
1 cup butter or margarine
3/4 cup sugar
3/4 cup firmly packed brown sugar
2 eggs
1 package (12 oz.) chocolate chips
Preheat oven to 375 degrees. Beat together margarine,
sugar, and brown sugar until creamy. Beat in eggs.
Combine flour, baking soda and salt. Gradually add
to margarine mixture. Stir in chocolate chips. Drop
by rounded teaspoonfuls onto ungreased cookie sheets.
Bake for 8-11 minutes, until golden brown.
Recipe C:
1 1/2 cups all purpose flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon salt
1 cup butter or margarine
3/4 cup sugar
3/4 cup firmly packed brown sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
2 eggs
1 package (12 oz.) chocolate chips
Preheat oven to 375 degrees. Beat together margarine, sugar, and brown sugar until creamy. Beat in eggs. Add vanilla. Combine flour, baking soda and salt. Gradually add to margarine mixture. Stir in chocolate chips. Drop
by rounded teaspoonfuls onto ungreased cookie sheets.Bake for 8-11 minutes, until golden brown.
Recipe D:
2 1/4 cups all purpose flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon salt
1 cup butter or margarine
3/4 cup sugar
3/4 cup firmly packed brown sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
1 egg
1 package (12 oz.) chocolate chips
Preheat oven to 375 degrees. Beat together margarine,
sugar, and brown sugar until creamy. Beat in the
egg. Add vanilla. Combine flour, baking soda and salt. Gradually add
to margarine mixture. Stir in chocolate chips. Drop
by rounded teaspoonfuls onto ungreased cookie sheets. Bake for 8-11 minutes, until golden brown.
Recipe E:
2 1/4 cups all purpose flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon salt
1 cup butter or margarine
3/4 cup sugar
3/4 cup firmly packed brown sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
2 eggs
1 package (12 oz.) raspberry chocolate chips (or
use any
type other than standard chocolate chips)
Preheat oven to 375 degrees.
Beat together margarine,sugar, and brown sugar until creamy. Beat in eggs. Add vanilla.
Combine flour, baking soda and salt. Gradually add
to margarine mixture. Stir in the chips. Drop by rounded teaspoonfuls onto ungreased cookie sheets.Bake for 8-11 minutes, until golden brown.
Recipe F:
2 1/4 cups all purpose flour
1 teaspoon baking soda
1 teaspoon salt
1 cup butter or margarine
1 1/2 cups sugar
1 teaspoon vanilla
2 eggs
1 package (12 oz.) chocolate chips
Preheat oven to 375 degrees. Beat together margarine
and sugar until creamy. Beat in eggs. Add vanilla. Combine flour,
baking soda and salt. Gradually add to margarine mixture.
Stir in chocolate chips. Drop by rounded teaspoonfuls onto ungreased
cookie sheets. Bake for 8-11 minutes, until golden brown.
|