|
We've had another look now at this event by
using sequencing of modern metazoan DNA and they've done this
with a number of different genes. There was a paper published
last year by my friend Jeff Levington and two other scientists.
They analyzed five different genes, genes like 18-S and cytochrome-C,
and others. They did a very careful analysis and compared those
genes where they may have appeared in the fossil record, got control
on them time-wise, and came to the conclusion that metazoans diverged
1.2 billion years ago. Another paleontologist, Simon Conway Morris,
examined that same set of data, and said you can't use three or
so of these genes, you can only use two of them and that gave
him a date of 700+ million years, still 150 or so million years
before the time we see the first shelly fossils.
None of this though takes into account the
other organisms that I was talking about, the algae, protozoans
and so forth. It only considers the metazoans. Let's
look at some of these hypotheses. We can sort them into intrinsic
and extrinsic factors . These are the things that may have
affected this great radiation of animals shortly after their first
appearance in the Vendian. Intrinsic factors are those that are
characteristic of and restricted to a particular group, like animals,
because of its biology. For example, the evolution of sex, of
regulatory genes, of body size, or habitat. But what I'm trying
to impress upon you is that it's not animals alone that radiate--it's
also algae, maybe even the bacteria, calcareous algae, radiolarians,
foraminifera and other fossils too. Therefore, I can focus on
what we call the extrinsic factors, those that are not really
part of the biology of the organisms but that would effect all
organisms in an ecosystem or in all ecosystems alike, such as
sea level changes, temperature fluctuations, glaciation, and many
others.
So let's take a look at some of these. Here
are some intrinsic causes of these things. None of these
really can account for the radiation in all groups. These are
metazoan-bound for the most part. When I talk to my metazoan
colleagues, they say: "Oh well, those other fossils don't
count. They're only single celled". Yeah, but they're
pretty complex. So these kinds of things really have been put
out as metazoan-bound hypotheses. There are more hypotheses than
what I've listed here. You wouldn't be able to read the slide
if I put them all up there because there are lots of them. But
there are some really interesting ideas. Large-size with primitive
skeletons, but we've got radiolarians and foraminifera which are
tiny and have minuscule skeletons. The evolution of sex, that's
always very important. But foraminifera and some of these algae
have sex too. The evolution of regulatory genes, well they have
them. Why should they all have happened at the same time? It's
a good question.
Let's go on and look at some of the extrinsic causes. There was an argument for awhile that was quite viable,
that larger organisms could not evolve until there was sufficient
oxygen available in the atmosphere and most of that came from
photosynthesis through cyanobacteria and the algae that existed
at the time, and that once everything got oxidized on the surface
of the Earth, then free oxygen would accumulate in the atmosphere.
That took 4 billion years to happen. So at 0.54 or 0.55 billion
years, there was sufficient oxygen around for the radiation of
these organisms and making skeletons. A number of other ideas
are here as well that we can talk about but that in fact can be
dismissed. They all may be linked in a some way, so that although
I'm laying out hypotheses here, in fact they all may be related
to one another in some big scenario. The one that I particularly
like, perhaps because I like to work in the oceans, is an oceanographic scenario that has to do with the production of nutrients in the
upper part of the ocean waters, the euphotic zone where sunlight
is available to the primary producers. These producers were the
algae I showed you pictures of and, surely, lots of others were
there too that did not preserve. This kind of production of
the primary producers would be able to transgress through all
ecosystems and cause all organisms to respond to the flow of trophic
(food) resources and energy through different ecosystems. If
you can come up with a hypothesis like that, that would account
for all of these things, I would be much more satisfied with it
than a strictly metazoan-bound hypothesis because that's too limited.
I want to point out that we really don't know
the answer to the problem that I'm addressing. Paleontologists
use a number of different methods to study these various problems.
I have some ideas about how to attack it. One, of course, would
be the molecular route; another would be to go and look for more
fossils. But I would like to go to this place, Palau,
near the Philippine Islands, and study an analogous situation
in the modern environment. Maybe it will tell us something.
Palau is a raised island group. In the Miocene, only 15 to 20
million years ago, this used to be a reef and it's been lifted
up. As you know, if you lived in Florida, when you uplift carbonate
rocks, like those forming the ancient reef, rainfall tends to
dissolve it and form sink holes, caves and other things. In Palau,
big sink holes form in the centers of the islands like this
one, which is about 400 meters by 100 meters, and there are cracks
through the limestone into the open ocean. This hole filled up
and became a marine lake. But it's really a unique marine lake.
It's filled with 1.6 million jellyfish. These jellyfish,
called Mastigias, have symbiotic algae in their bells;
so they track the sun because those symbiotic algae photosynthesize
and supply the animals with all the energy they need. This big
wall of jellyfish is because trees shade this part and the jellyfish
don't go into the shade. They need the sun for their symbionts.
The jellyfish are just everywhere, and
that's about all there is in this lake except for a few other
interesting things that I want to show you. Here's me for
scale so you get an idea of how big these things are. But there
are some other things in this lake. This is a marine lake; there
may be 150 species of a group living outside the lake on the open
ocean whereas there are only four or five in the lake itself,
like foraminifera. One of the groups are sea anemones.
They live on the rocks and on logs that have fallen in and they
catch the jellyfish and eat them as they go by. There are two
kinds of jellyfish: Mastigias which lives in the upper
part of the water column because it needs to photosynthesize with
its algae and Aurelia which lives deeper down, down to
about 45 feet. Look at this bottom. Wow, that's what gets me
excited. That's an algal mat living on the bottom. It's
all cracked up, it's loaded with bacteria. This is beginning to
look like the sediments and the fauna that we see in the Vendian
rocks on the White Sea. At least it's tempting enough to go and
say let's study this. How did the jellyfish or do these jellyfish
ever get preserved? What role did the bacteria play? What kind
of preservation do the bacteria have for themselves? We can use
a modern study to get at that question of what's going on, we
hope.
There's another interesting thing about this
lake and that is at 45 feet in depth, as you dive down, you come
to a layer of bacteria that's floating in the water column of
the lake. The lake is 90 feet deep. So below this layer of bacteria,
which absorbs all light and just completely eats up anything that
falls into the lake, below it the lake is anoxic, no oxygen at
all. It's hydrogen sulfide. You dive down there and then come
back out and you smell like eggs, rotten eggs for a couple of
days. So you have to be sure you dive with your friends or you
won't have any. Now I'm trying to think about getting people
like Stan who works on bacteria and people who work on the biology
of the jellyfish and people who work on sedimentary processes
and how fossils are preserved to go with me; maybe get one of
these astrobiology grants from NASA, and say here's an analogous
situation alive today that we can go and study that's not unlike
what we see at the very beginning of the radiation of animals.
Wouldn't that be wonderful?
Incidentally, astrobiology is the wrong term
for this program, it should be astropaleontology. Just think
about it, how are we likely ever to find a true astrobiological
community out there other than ours. You have to hit them at
exactly the right time. Most likely we'll find fossils out in
space, I think. So it should be astropaleontology. What do you
think, Stan? Let's go for it. So that's where we're going to
go, I hope. Looking at molecular biology, modern situations, as
well as reinterpretations and additional interpretations of existing
fossils. The answers are not in, in spite of media like Time Magazine.
And I'm sure NBC will get it one of these days!
Thank you very much.
|