|
EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE
PASADENA, CA- Southern California, which one year ago
suffered a catastrophic series of earthquakes and aftershocks, is
likely to experience more of the same and possibly even worse,
according to several new studies.
Prior to the Northridge earthquake of 1994 most
seismologists concerned themselves primarily with the threat
posed by the notorious San Andreas fault which passes some 40 km
north of Los Angeles. However, last year's quake shifted
researchers attention to smaller, lesser known faults passing
directly underneath the highly populated Los Angeles basin.
Nearly a hundred active faults have been identified in the L.A.
area, of which six are of particular concern. It is new findings
about these faults that has geologists sounding the alarm about
future quakes.
Researchers at CalTech believe that the L.A. basin has been
in a lull between large quakes. An analyses of geologic slip
rates and relations between the magnitude of previous quakes,
seismic slippage and rupture suggests a series of quakes of
similar size to the Northridge quake (i.e. 6.7 on the Richter
scale), or one very large quake (Richter 8 or above), or possibly
even a combination of the two are overdue. The projections are
based on the hypothesis that in a 200 year period a Northridge
level quake would be expected every eleven years or so, and
larger quakes above 7.2 would be felt every 140 years or so.
"Far too few moderate earthquakes have occurred within the
Los Angeles metropolitan region during the 200-year-long historic
period to account for observed strain accumulation, indicating
that the historic era represents either a lull between clusters
of moderate earthquakes or part of a centuries long interseismic
period between much larger events," notes Dr. James Dolan,
Seismologic Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena,CA, in Science.
The data can be interpreted to suggest either that several
Richter 6 earthquakes are due, or one really large quake may be
coming. Of the two projections, Dr. Dolan believes the latter,
the one predicting an earthquake above Richter 7.2 (the level of
the recent Kobe quake) is the more plausible. He bases his
conclusion on the existing data about strain accumulation on
known faults. Such an earthquake would be considerably more
destructive than last year's California temblor. This, combined
with scenes from Kobe, suggests an urgent need for disaster
preparedness on the part of civil authorities in Southern
California.
In related study, Dr. S.E. Hough of the U.S. Geologic Survey
developed a predictive model indicating a fractal distribution
of earthquake rupture areas in the L.A. Basin. His study suggests
that one large earthquake (Richter 7.4 to 7.5) would occur every
245 to 325 years and/or that moderate earthquakes (Richter 6.7)
would occur every 40 to 52 years. An alternate theory based on
research by the National Science Foundation holds that L.A.
faults may have been slipping gradually over the centuries, so
reducing chance of 'the Big One'.
According to the National Earthquake Information Center,
earthquakes ranging from 6.0 to 6.9 on the Richter scale occur
150 times a year somewhere on the planet. One to two dozen
earthquakes in the 7.0 to 7.9 range occur each year, along with
one earthquake in the 8 to 8.9 range.
The studies by Drs. Dolan and Hough are reported in Science,
1/13/95, v.267.
|