What's News
-Advertisement-
  About AE   About NHM   Contact Us   Terms of Use   Copyright Info   Privacy Policy   Advertising Policies   Site Map
   
Custom Search of AE Site
spacer spacer
TWO HIV TESTS MAY NOT BE ENOUGH

By Sean Henahan, Access Excellence


PARIS One or even two negative tests for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) does not mean that infection --and the possibility of developing AIDS--will not occur, according to recent findings from Dr. Jean Jacques Lefrere, and his associates at Institut National de Transfusion Sanguine, Saint Antoine Hospital.

The French researchers report the case of a woman who was negative for HIV antibodies three times over a six month period. However, she began to develop symptoms after the last test and when she was re-tested at eight months, she was found to be HIV antibody positive. The 46 year old Algerian woman, who worked as a cleaner in a hospital, accidentally picked up and was pricked with an HIVcontaminated needle. By French law she was tested at the time of the accident, and then again three and six months later. She had none of the known risk factors for HIV infection.

The fact that she did not become HIV positive until eight months after the accident suggests that the usual yardstick of two tests over a six months period does not eliminate the possibility that infection has taken place, Dr. Lefrere said:

" The possibility of a serologically silent window of more than six months may have public health consequences. The underestimation of the diagnosis of HIV infection may wrongly lead to reassurance of individuals remaining negative six months after the potentially infectious accident may contribute to further transmission.

" Indeed, infected persons may have a high level of viremia before seroconversion and are likely to be highly infectious for their partners. Moreover years could pass before the diagnosis of HIV infection and the individual could miss opportunities for early treatment," he noted.

The French investigators suggests that the reason that it took so long to detect HIV in the woman was that it may have been a weaker form of the virus or because she received it in such a small dose that it took a longer than usual time to build up in her body to the point where it became detectable. They noted that although all of the tests commonly used to detect HIV, including ELISA, Western blot and p24 antibody assays were consistently negative within the first six months after the woman's accident, they subsequently become strongly in the later tests. In addition, concentrations of the CD4 T-lymphocytes used as a measure of infection rose steadily with subsequent testing.

The case was reported in The Lancet, Vol., 345, June 24, 1955, pp. 1634-1635.

 


AIDS info online

Project Inform


Science Updates Index


What's News Index


Feedback


 
Today's Health and
BioScience News
Science Update Archives Factoids Newsmaker Interviews
Archive

 
Custom Search on the AE Site

 

-Advertisement-